[Discuss] important question

[(spam-protected)]

2014-04-28 14:47 GMT+02:00 L. Aaron Kaplan <(spam-protected)>:

>
> On Apr 28, 2014, at 2:28 PM, (spam-protected) wrote:
>
> > As far as I know, all Funkfeuer nodes are stationary, therefore support
> for node mobility is not really that important for our community.
> >
>
> Basically yes, all nodes are stationary.
> *However* you could regard the "cell-breathing" phenomenon (which is well
> known from mobile phone networks) as a sort of mobility:
> the reachability of nodes varies over time (other noise is mostly the main
> culprit).
>
Yes, you could regard that as mobility. but not as "mobile node
move with high speed (e.g. 4mps)"


>
> So, it does make sense to have "mobility" (a.k.a meshing in the sense of
> MANETS) in community wireless networks.
> It's just darn practical :)
>

okey. well. you're free to develop / find a routing protocol that supports
it and is superior to our current one. ;)


>
> My 2 cents,
> a.
>
> > Regards, Thomas K.
> >
> >
> > 2014-04-27 17:29 GMT+02:00 BEHRANG BAREKATAIN <(spam-protected)>:
> > Dear
> >
> > I need to know how FunkFeuer support node mobility in a WMN?
> > Actually, it uses proactive protocol. This tye of protocols cannot
> perform well in dynamic networks where mobile node move with high speed
> (e.g. 4mps) in the network, because it is necessary to update routing
> tables for many times. This imposes high network overhead on the network.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Behrang
> >
> > --
> > Discuss mailing list
> > (spam-protected)
> > https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> > --
> > Discuss mailing list
> > (spam-protected)
> > https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt...
URL: <http://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140428/9576737c/attachment.htm>