<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2014-04-28 14:47 GMT+02:00 L. Aaron Kaplan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aaron@lo-res.org" target="_blank">aaron@lo-res.org</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class=""><br>
On Apr 28, 2014, at 2:28 PM, <a href="mailto:kaefert@gmail.com">kaefert@gmail.com</a> wrote:<br>
<br>
> As far as I know, all Funkfeuer nodes are stationary, therefore support for node mobility is not really that important for our community.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>Basically yes, all nodes are stationary.<br>
*However* you could regard the "cell-breathing" phenomenon (which is well known from mobile phone networks) as a sort of mobility:<br>
the reachability of nodes varies over time (other noise is mostly the main culprit).<br></blockquote><div>Yes, you could regard that as mobility. but not as "<span style="font-size:13px;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">mobile node </span><span style="font-size:13px;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">move with high speed (e.g. </span><span style="font-size:13px;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">4mps)</span>"</div>
<div>Â </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
So, it does make sense to have "mobility" (a.k.a meshing in the sense of MANETS) in community wireless networks.<br>
It's just darn practical :)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>okey. well. you're free to develop / find a routing protocol that supports it and is superior to our current one. ;)</div><div>Â </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
My 2 cents,<br>
<div class=""><div class="h5">a.<br>
<br>
> Regards, Thomas K.<br>
><br>
><br>
> 2014-04-27 17:29 GMT+02:00 BEHRANG BAREKATAIN <<a href="mailto:bbehrang3@live.utm.my">bbehrang3@live.utm.my</a>>:<br>
> Dear<br>
><br>
> I need to know how FunkFeuer support node mobility in a WMN?<br>
> Actually, it uses proactive protocol. This tye of protocols cannot perform well in dynamic networks where mobile node move with high speed (e.g. 4mps) in the network, because it is necessary to update routing tables for many times. This imposes high network overhead on the network.<br>
><br>
> Best Regards<br>
> Behrang<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Discuss mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.funkfeuer.at">Discuss@lists.funkfeuer.at</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Discuss mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.funkfeuer.at">Discuss@lists.funkfeuer.at</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>