[Interop-dev] Device Config: physical_devices doubt: phy0 vs radio0

[Nemesis]

From all the answers I've got it seems is ok to keep the name
"physical_device" and to let implementations insert what they think most
proper in it.

Here there are a few of these answers:
https://github.com/interop-dev/json-for-networks/issues/3

If I won't get other feedback about this issue I'll close it by next friday.

Federico


On 11/27/2014 04:05 PM, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote:
> radio0 is the name openwrt UCI config give to the physic device
> phy0 is the name linux kernel/driver give to the physic device 
>
>
> On Thursday 27 November 2014 10:36:51 Nemesis wrote:
>> I opened a new issuehere:
>> https://github.com/interop-dev/json-for-networks/issues/3
>> /
>> /*Pasted text:*/
>>
>> / /Is there difference between phy0 and radio0?//
>> //
>> //In the nodewatcher-agent example posted in #1 both are mentioned but
>> only radio0 has a definition.//
>> //
>> //Via openwrt ubus I see no mention of any phy object, but I see mention
>> of radio0 (via ubus call network.wireless status, just it doesnt have
>> the information contained in our physical_devices section, but something
>> slightly different.//
>> //
>> //Via the iw command I see that interfaces reference a phy object, and
>> iw phy returns all the capabilities of the physical device.//
>> //
>> //I am a bit confused. Can anyone bring some clarity?/