[Interop-dev] JSON formats update
Nicolás Echániz
(spam-protected)
Wed Nov 26 04:51:26 CET 2014
With the baby and the house building I haven't been able to follow all
the discussion but I'll pop in now that there's an update, with a couple
of observations; please forgive me if these have already been discussed.
Maybe it would make things more clear if we were to split the
information that is now present in the DeviceConfiguration example into
three different components:
0) Social/Community information (community, owner, admin, etc.)
1) Static device information
2) Configuration data
Static and Config might be difficult to diferentiate, but I would
deffinitely move Social/Community data away from DeviceConfiguration.
Cheers,
Nico
On 11/25/2014 11:51 AM, Nemesis wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> i've been thinking a lot about all the things we wrote and said, I
> chatted and talked to as much people as I could, included some openwrt
> devs on irc and I tried to condense everything in these latest changes:
>
> * repo name changed: https://github.com/interop-dev/json-for-networks
>
> * added link to mailing list in README to facilitate newcomers to join
>
> * added monitoring data example:
> https://github.com/interop-dev/json-for-networks/blob/master/examples/monitoring-data.json
> - it's basically a merge of nodewatcher-agent and ubus, but only the
> data that changes costantly
>
> * simplified network topology example:
> https://github.com/interop-dev/json-for-networks/commit/d24486c510df725272dded572bd39b013bfa22f1
> - I liked henning's initial JSON proposal more than what I came up
> with later, so I made it more similar to the initial one
>
> * more complete config : added virtual interfaces, vlan, bridge
>
> * config json example: made it more similar to ubus and
> nodewatcher-agent when possible (that is when it didn't contradict
> what we said or wrote previously)
>
> I think we are moving closer to something useful.
>
> The next step I want to make is to get feedback from the openwrt-dev list.
>
> But before I'd love to hear feedback from you all first.
>
> When you have time, please read the README
> https://github.com/interop-dev/json-for-networks/blob/master/README.rst
> and take a look at the example of the format you are mostly interested
> in: https://github.com/interop-dev/json-for-networks/tree/master/examples
>
> If you see something that looks wrong or makes you doubtful bring it up
> again.
>
> Unresolved feedback will be merged with the feedback from openwrt-dev.
>
> I also encourage you all to star and watch the repo on github.
>
> Federico
More information about the Interop-dev
mailing list