[Interop-dev] Great outcome! Let's decide on a name

[L. Aaron Kaplan]

On Apr 7, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Federico Capoano wrote:
(...)

> 
> I agree, we are not in a hurry, let's not just vote and the majority wins. Let's discuss.
> Voting is good to see which are the options where there is more consensus.
> 
> Bytheway Mitar weren't you the one that reminded us to use the titanpad to put names on? So I guess Mario was intending that for voting. He might have been simply following your suggestion, I don't think (and hope) he meant to vote in a "democratic" way where the majority rules.
> 
> The thing I want to understand is the following:
> 
> Are we developing something new? Or are we developing nodewatcher?
> In the first case the name should be new, in the second the name should stay.
> 
Yes, for me we are defintely developing something new based on the ideas of the framework of nodewatcher (registry branch). 

a.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/interop-dev/attachments/20120412/3d28ca92/attachment.sig>