[Interop-dev] Great outcome! Let's decide on a name

L. Aaron Kaplan (spam-protected)
Thu Apr 12 21:57:30 CEST 2012

On Apr 7, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Federico Capoano wrote:

> I agree, we are not in a hurry, let's not just vote and the majority wins. Let's discuss.
> Voting is good to see which are the options where there is more consensus.
> Bytheway Mitar weren't you the one that reminded us to use the titanpad to put names on? So I guess Mario was intending that for voting. He might have been simply following your suggestion, I don't think (and hope) he meant to vote in a "democratic" way where the majority rules.
> The thing I want to understand is the following:
> Are we developing something new? Or are we developing nodewatcher?
> In the first case the name should be new, in the second the name should stay.
Yes, for me we are defintely developing something new based on the ideas of the framework of nodewatcher (registry branch). 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/interop-dev/attachments/20120412/3d28ca92/attachment.sig>

More information about the Interop-dev mailing list