[Interop-dev] NetJSON

[Henning Rogge]

Multiple logical views of the same network... or maybe of overlapping
networks.

Each topology would have an ID and there should be an additional NetJSON
object that tells you the list of topologies (and maybe optionally some
data about them).

Henning

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:12 AM Federico Capoano <
(spam-protected)> wrote:

> So different representations of the same network?
>
> Federico
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:20 PM Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> multiple sets of routing tables filled by different dijkstra-instances.
>>
>> E.g. one set of a community-mesh without the "backup-VPN" links and
>> another one with the backup links. Or one with "low latency" links useful
>> for voice traffic and the other one with all links in the network.
>>
>> Henning
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:21 PM Federico Capoano <
>> (spam-protected)> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Henning,
>>>
>>> sorry for my late response, it's great to hear you're working on that.
>>> What is the definition of multi-topology environment?
>>>
>>> Federico
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 6:46 AM Henning Rogge <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Federico,
>>>>
>>>> we (Fraunhofer FKIE) are also working on a set of changes to allow to
>>>> use NetJSON in a multi-topology environment.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we can revive this mailing list?
>>>>
>>>> Henning
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:08 PM Federico Capoano <
>>>> (spam-protected)> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jake,
>>>>>
>>>>> yes we are still active here, although the one who is mostly working
>>>>> on it it's me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have sent an update on the current situation last month, you can
>>>>> find it in the archive at this link:
>>>>> https://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/interop-dev/2018-September/000753.html
>>>>>
>>>>> This week I also talked about this work at the IETF Meeting in
>>>>> Bangkok. The slides are here:
>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/slides-103-gaia-openwisp-a-hackable-network-management-system-for-the-21st-centry-00 altough
>>>>> I mostly talked over screenshots, maybe the recording is available
>>>>> somewhere (if you're interested let me know).
>>>>>
>>>>> As you may understand, theory and experimental evidence are two
>>>>> different beasts and once experimental evidence shows that the theoretical
>>>>> model needs to be updated there's work to be done to update it. I'm in the
>>>>> phase of collecting experimental evidence and I think I'm 80% done with it:
>>>>> that's how I'd summarize the status of NetJSON.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know what you think! Thanks for getting in touch.
>>>>> Federico
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 5:41 PM Jake Opie (IS) <(spam-protected)>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you still working on this standard? Because I would like to use
>>>>>> your NetJSON standard in my visualising tool for our MPLS network.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jake
>>>>>> [image: 118110914035101809.jpg]
>>>>>> *Jake Opie*
>>>>>> Principal Solutions Architect
>>>>>> [image: 118110914035101209.jpg]
>>>>>> T +27 11 5757972 <+27%2011%20575%207972>   M +27 72 4789138
>>>>>> <+27%2072%20478%209138>
>>>>>> [image: 118110914035101609.gif]
>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/internetsolutionsglobal/>
>>>>>> [image: 118110914035102109.gif] <https://twitter.com/IS_global>
>>>>>> [image: 118110914035101009.gif] <https://twitter.com/IS_global>
>>>>>> [image: 118110914035101409.gif] <https://www.is.co.za/> Disclaimer: Click
>>>>>> here
>>>>>> <https://www.is.co.za/legal/#e-mail-confidentiality-notice-and-disclaimer>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Interop-dev mailing list
>>>>>> (spam-protected)
>>>>>> https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/interop-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Interop-dev mailing list
>>>>> (spam-protected)
>>>>> https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/interop-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/interop-dev/attachments/20181120/82e093f5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 118110914035101009.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1420 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/interop-dev/attachments/20181120/82e093f5/attachment-0004.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 118110914035101209.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7618 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/interop-dev/attachments/20181120/82e093f5/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 118110914035101409.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1432 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/interop-dev/attachments/20181120/82e093f5/attachment-0005.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 118110914035101609.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1420 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/interop-dev/attachments/20181120/82e093f5/attachment-0006.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 118110914035101809.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4336 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/interop-dev/attachments/20181120/82e093f5/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 118110914035102109.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1439 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/interop-dev/attachments/20181120/82e093f5/attachment-0007.gif>