[Interop-dev] NetworkGraph: "source" attribute might be confusing

Nemesis (spam-protected)
Mon Aug 24 11:27:19 CEST 2015


Henning,

Do you mean to:

  * rename source to source_prefix
  * rename destination to destination_prefix

Fed


On 08/13/2015 10:55 AM, Henning Rogge wrote:
> maybe "sourceprefix" and "destinationprefix" ?
>
> Henning
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Nemesis <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>> I am also not really convinced.
>>
>> The reason we chose "source" and "target" is because is widely used in
>> other contexts that regard network graphs (d3 library, similar
>> specifications). Having similar attributes to widely used conventions
>> may make adoption easier.
>>
>> Would it be possible to choose a slightly different name in
>> NetworkRoutes for the "source" field instead?
>>
>> Federico
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/13/2015 08:46 AM, Henning Rogge wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think the "source" and "target" attribute could be exchanged with
>>> "from" and "to"... but I am not really convinced about it.
>>>
>>> Henning
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Nemesis <(spam-protected)> wrote:
>>>> In NetworkRoutes we have a "source" attribute for source sensitive routing.
>>>>
>>>> In NetworkGraph we have "source" and "target" attributes referring to the
>>>> two points connected by the link.
>>>>
>>>> Do you think "source" in NetworkGraph might be confused with something
>>>> related to source sensitive routing?
>>>>
>>>> Federico
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Interop-dev mailing list
>>>> (spam-protected)
>>>> https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/interop-dev
>>>>
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.funkfeuer.at/pipermail/interop-dev/attachments/20150824/092d8bda/attachment.html>


More information about the Interop-dev mailing list