[Interop-dev] domain name / project name

Mario Behling (spam-protected)
Fri Apr 13 05:46:58 CEST 2012


how about a few more people add their name to their favourites and
then we find consensus on the mainlinglist?

As explanation about the vote: As mentioned by Federico in previous
mails, the vote thing was more intended to get an idea (or rough
consensus) of what we want. I did not explain, but personally I never
intended to have a majority vote. I am for rough consensus. So, I see
that Aaron is partly right - there is a rough consensus, but on the
other hand I think the process had not ended as Mitar points out.

While it is not the most important question for the future of this
project, the questions is still: What name can be agreed on? (Actually
it is not so much effort to go the step to the end and decide. So,
let's do it.)

About the discussion apart from that, I am a bit confused, cause I had
thought in Athens consensus was also to create something new and that
is why also a new name quest was proposed. I understood for example
that people were looking for a new name and nodeshot or nodewatcher
was not a name option, cause it was a project of one community.
Personally I do not care. Nevertheless, it is a bit strange if their
is consensus and then, afterwards, we start again from the beginning
leaving out a previous decision.

Anyways, so what name do you want, please leave your name in the
Titanpad for a final round (which I propose, but you can propse s.th.
different if you think it is better). Then, the left over two or three
main option can be decided here. Do you agree?

- Mario

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Mitar <(spam-protected)> wrote:
> Hi!
>> I prefer to simply have rough consensus (which I for sure saw already
>> by the voting) and proceed.
> A tie in voting (if we check the votes you were looking at and not the
> ones Mario proposed once there was a tie) is a rough consensus for you?
> Mitar

More information about the Interop-dev mailing list