<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Latest changes:<br>
      <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/interop-dev/network-device-schema/compare/8bb8d21f12...7f746588df">https://github.com/interop-dev/network-device-schema/compare/8bb8d21f12...7f746588df</a><br>
      <ul>
        <li>renamed "os" to "operating_system"</li>
        <li>renamed "router" to "router_id" in "routing_protocols"
          section<br>
        </li>
      </ul>
      I need to ask 1 more little question:<br>
      <br>
      The <b>"device"</b> attribute in a wireless interface points to
      elements in "<b>physical_devices</b>".<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/interop-dev/network-device-schema/blob/7f746588df4f70429dafbb0df80775dbe73b531b/network-device-configuration-example.json#L26">https://github.com/interop-dev/network-device-schema/blob/7f746588df4f70429dafbb0df80775dbe73b531b/network-device-configuration-example.json#L26</a><br>
      <br>
      is it ok to call the attribute "device"? Or should we call it
      "physical_device"?<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      Now let's go back to the few remaining open points:<br>
      <br>
      On 11/14/2014 02:57 PM, Nemesis wrote:<br>
      <br>
      ...<br>
      <br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:54660A44.6020204@ninux.org" type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      what should the possible values of "encryption" in a wireless
      interface be?
      <ul>
        <ul>
          <li>"none" or do you prefer false (boolean)? <br>
          </li>
          <li>"wep"</li>
          <li>"wpa"</li>
          <li>"wpa2"</li>
          <li>"802.1x"</li>
          <li>others?<br>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </ul>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Let's start with the standard ones in openwrt:<br>
    <ul>
      <li>none for an open network</li>
      <li>wep for WEP</li>
      <li>psk for WPA-PSK</li>
      <li>psk2 for WPA2-PSK</li>
    </ul>
    Plus this list<br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/wireless#wpa.modes">http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/wireless#wpa.modes</a><br>
    <br>
    Ok?<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:54660A44.6020204@ninux.org" type="cite">
      <ul>
        <li>in case encryption is different than none, shall we start
          mapping this type of config now or shall we delay it to a
          later moment?<br>
        </li>
      </ul>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Let's not do this now, we can do it at a later moment if we feel the
    need.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:54660A44.6020204@ninux.org" type="cite"><br>
      <ul>
        <li>are you ok with renaming output_power in tx_power in a radio
          physical device?<br>
          <br>
        </li>
      </ul>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    let's keep tx_power<br>
    <br>
    ...<br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:54660A44.6020204@ninux.org" type="cite"><br>
      <ul>
        <li>so far the ip configuration of this example has been static,
          how could we represent a DHCP setup? </li>
      </ul>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Kotsko, you mentioned you had a similar case in one of your
    examples.<br>
    <br>
    Did you mean this example?<br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://gist.github.com/kostko/9b6eb44f373e17891d65">https://gist.github.com/kostko/9b6eb44f373e17891d65</a><br>
    Or another one?<br>
    <br>
    Federico<br>
  </body>
</html>