<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Latest changes:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/interop-dev/network-device-schema/compare/8bb8d21f12...7f746588df">https://github.com/interop-dev/network-device-schema/compare/8bb8d21f12...7f746588df</a><br>
<ul>
<li>renamed "os" to "operating_system"</li>
<li>renamed "router" to "router_id" in "routing_protocols"
section<br>
</li>
</ul>
I need to ask 1 more little question:<br>
<br>
The <b>"device"</b> attribute in a wireless interface points to
elements in "<b>physical_devices</b>".<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/interop-dev/network-device-schema/blob/7f746588df4f70429dafbb0df80775dbe73b531b/network-device-configuration-example.json#L26">https://github.com/interop-dev/network-device-schema/blob/7f746588df4f70429dafbb0df80775dbe73b531b/network-device-configuration-example.json#L26</a><br>
<br>
is it ok to call the attribute "device"? Or should we call it
"physical_device"?<br>
<br>
<br>
Now let's go back to the few remaining open points:<br>
<br>
On 11/14/2014 02:57 PM, Nemesis wrote:<br>
<br>
...<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:54660A44.6020204@ninux.org" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
what should the possible values of "encryption" in a wireless
interface be?
<ul>
<ul>
<li>"none" or do you prefer false (boolean)? <br>
</li>
<li>"wep"</li>
<li>"wpa"</li>
<li>"wpa2"</li>
<li>"802.1x"</li>
<li>others?<br>
</li>
</ul>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<br>
Let's start with the standard ones in openwrt:<br>
<ul>
<li>none for an open network</li>
<li>wep for WEP</li>
<li>psk for WPA-PSK</li>
<li>psk2 for WPA2-PSK</li>
</ul>
Plus this list<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/wireless#wpa.modes">http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/wireless#wpa.modes</a><br>
<br>
Ok?<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:54660A44.6020204@ninux.org" type="cite">
<ul>
<li>in case encryption is different than none, shall we start
mapping this type of config now or shall we delay it to a
later moment?<br>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<br>
Let's not do this now, we can do it at a later moment if we feel the
need.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:54660A44.6020204@ninux.org" type="cite"><br>
<ul>
<li>are you ok with renaming output_power in tx_power in a radio
physical device?<br>
<br>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<br>
let's keep tx_power<br>
<br>
...<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:54660A44.6020204@ninux.org" type="cite"><br>
<ul>
<li>so far the ip configuration of this example has been static,
how could we represent a DHCP setup? </li>
</ul>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Kotsko, you mentioned you had a similar case in one of your
examples.<br>
<br>
Did you mean this example?<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://gist.github.com/kostko/9b6eb44f373e17891d65">https://gist.github.com/kostko/9b6eb44f373e17891d65</a><br>
Or another one?<br>
<br>
Federico<br>
</body>
</html>